Seminar: Buddhism and The West, hosted by Richard Pope
A review of Buddhism, Mindfulness, and Capitalism. Please read as many of the following as possible. We’ll prioritize discussing Zizek, but I’ve also included a slew of other readings to consider.
(1) Slajov Zizek’s critique – https://bigthink.com/postcards-from-zizek/slavoj-zizek-on-buddhism-and-the-self and http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/2/western.php
(2) Ronald Purser, David Loy, “Beyond McMindfulness” – https://www.huffpost.com/entry/beyond-mcmindfulness_b_3519289?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAH8hCcHwEPA_0ND5pUMmkfDzfJPCE7C8RAYNY-hOh90rzrQgJdBroe-kWVSwUzsFwjWIc6gZgd21l92J3sowgdsS7VXjPPzzHWde4Ba4U2359pGYddkbQOPE2R7CXdk4Ff62ETeNkGaLHNe0Qgn-r0R9GRqjJO3rIEq_JhMW3Cyo
(3)Michael Stone, “Abusing the Buddha: How the U.S. Army and Google co-opt mindfulness” – https://www.salon.com/2014/03/17/abusing_the_buddha_how_the_u_s_army_and_google_co_opt_mindfulness/
(4) Ronald Purser, Edwin Ng, “Zen, you’re working harder and being paid less” – https://www.salon.com/2015/09/27/corporate_mindfulness_is_bullsht_zen_or_no_zen_youre_working_harder_and_being_paid_less/
(5) Jon Kabatt-Zin, “This is not McMindfulness by any stretch of the imagination” – https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/not-mcmindfulness-any-stretch-imagination
(6) Robert Sharf, “Is Mindfulness Buddhist? (and why it matters)” – http://buddhiststudies.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/sharf/documents/Sharf%20Is%20Mindfulness%20Buddhist.pdf
(7) Ajahn Amaro, “A Holistic Mindfulness” – https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12671-014-0382-3
What is Buddhist truth? How is Buddhism evolving as it takes root and grows in the United States and the west?
These are the two fundamental questions that this group seeks to answer. We’ll approach these questions from the perspective that there is something both timeless and transcendent about the truth Buddhism describes, but also that the practice and expression of Buddhism is both time-bound and culturally-dependent. Participants are encouraged to form their own answers to the above questions, which for the purpose of our discussion will be perpetually regarded as “open.”
The global moment is unique for Buddhism, which “encounters itself anew” as its major branches converge after 100s or even 1,000s of years of separation, while simultaneously being powerfully influenced by: western ideologies such as romanticism, nihilism, and postmodernism; scientific-materialism and its offshoots such as quantum physics and the brain sciences; popular culture and world-cultures; consumerism and spiritual-consumerism; and countless other forces both overt and subtle, which we shall spend no small amount of time attempting to elucidate during our discussions.
Our method is to meet each week to discuss a text. We’ll split our efforts between reading (1) primary texts from the three major Buddhist lineages (Theravada, Zen, and Tibetan Buddhism); (2) primary texts of western philosophers who’ve been influenced by Buddhism or who have ideas compatible with Buddhist philosophy; (3) secondary texts of recent scholarship that offer insights relevant to our endeavor; and (4) tertiary texts of a wide variety of related and not-so-related topics as the group sees fit and which align with our trajectory, wherever it may ultimately take us.
Readings will likely be between 20-50 pages per week, depending on the difficulty of the text and its “discussion potential.”
Upcoming readings / topics:
– Comparison of Nagarjuna’s Mulamadhyamakakarika and Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, to explore what we can speak of and what we cannot speak of.
Prior readings / topics:
– Minimal Phenomenal Experience, by Thomas Metzinger – https://osf.io/jd78a
– Greek Buddha, by Christopher Beckwith
– The Debate of King Milinda (Milinda Panha) – http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/milinda.pdf